Thailand’s Supreme Court has issued an arrest warrant after ex-PM Yingluck Shinawatra failed to appear for the verdict in the case regarding her rice subsidy scheme. Hundreds of her supporters had gathered outside.

Thailand Bangkog Yingluck Shinawatra vor Gerichtsgebäude (Getty Images/AFP/L. Suwanrumpha)

Unconfirmed reports on Friday strongly suggested that Yingluck Shinawatra had left the country, possibly for Singapore. Sources from Shinawatra’s Puea Thai Party told multiple news agencies that she was no longer in Thailand.

“She has definitely left the country, most likely Wednesday evening. She is currently in Singapore, but I don’t know how long she will stay there or where her next destination might be,” one source told the German DPA agency, asking not to be named.

After Shinawatra did not show up in court on Friday, Thailand’s Supreme Court postponed the planned verdict on her  ill-fated 2011 rice subsidy scheme and issued a warrant for her arrest. Shinawatra’s lawyer said the politician was unwell.

“At 8 a.m. Yingluck’s team contacted me to say it had told the court she could not show up because of an ear fluid imbalance,” Yingluck’s lawyer, Norawit Lalaeng, told reporters.

Thailand protests against Yingluck's arrest warrantYingluck’s supporters gathered outside the court to show their love

Government reactions

The Thai Prime Minister Prayuth Chan-ocha ordered increased controls at the country’s border checkpoints.

“This morning I thought it was brave of her to show up in court, but it turned out she did not. Officials are looking for her,” he told reporters.

Thai military-backed authorities had threatened legal action against Yingluck supporters Friday as the nation awaited the verdict on whether Yingluck was negligent in raising rice prices paid to farmers by the government after her party won the election in 2011.

Her plan, back then, had been to give a degree of financial security to poor rural farmers, by at least providing them with the minimum wage. At the time, Yingluck defended the plan, saying “This is not a new policy. It has been around for 30 years.”

According to Wolfram Schaffar, political scientist and Thailand expert from the University of Vienna, “It was absolutely a standard program. I think that the opposition has artificially overstated the situation.”

Yingluck has pleaded not guilty while prosecutors allege staggering losses of $17 billion to the state resulting from the scheme. She is being held liable for about $1 billion (847 million euros). If convicted, Yingluck has the right to appeal, but could end up with 10 years jail.

Yet according to Schaffar, “There is no such thing as a fair trial in Thailand. The justice system is not independent and this manifests itself on all levels of the legal system.”

Read more: Thais divided over their political future

Watch video03:55

Trial reflects a decade-long political conflict

Criticism of rice subsidy scheme used to grab power

The scheme left Thailand with inflated rice prices, just as rival growers like India and Vietnam were boosting production and lowering prices. India ultimately knocked Thailand from its top exporter perch. The current regime has also accused Shinawatra of trying to buy votes by subsidizing farmers in the rural areas where her party dominates. Yet, as Schaffar says, the case is an extension of the decade-long struggle between the movement founded by Yingluck’s brother, Thaksin, which was embraced by Thailand’s northern rural poor, and an elite comprising royalists, the military and their urban backers.

There have been no elections in Thailand since the 2014 coup that ousted Shinawatra. Thailand’s junta has clamped down since the coup, suppressing dissent and banning political gatherings of more than five people. After multiple delays, it is currently promising a vote in 2018.

A 2016 referendum did bring a new constitution, which strengthened the constitutional court and anti-corruption authorities. But in reality, this has led to the constitutional court merely serving the interests of the elite. Schaffar says, “The goal has been to weaken the elements of direct democracy…Parliament is surrounded by institutions, whose members are recruited from the elite and who are able to overwrite governmental decisions.”

Read more:  Thailand’s democratic future at a crossroads

Yingluck is already subject to a five-year ban from politics, imposed by the military junta’s legislature in 2015 when she was charged with corruption over the rice program.

DW RECOMMENDS

AUDIOS AND VIDEOS ON THE TOPIC

Courtesy, DW

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s